Fundamental Science Unimathematical Test Fundamental Metasciences System
by
© Ph. D. & Dr. Sc. Lev Gelimson
Academic Institute for Creating Fundamental Sciences (Munich, Germany)
Mathematical Journal
of the "Collegium" All World Academy of Sciences
Munich (Germany)
12 (2012), 1
Keywords: Fundamental science, megascience, revolution, mega-overmathematics, unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system, knowledge, philosophy, strategy, tactic, analysis, synthesis, object, operation, relation, criterion, conclusion, evaluation, measurement, estimation, expression, modeling, processing, symmetry, invariance, bound, level, worst case, defect, mistake, error, reserve, reliability, risk, supplement, improvement, modernization, variation, modification, correction, transformation, generalization, replacement.
Introduction
There are many separate scientific achievements of mankind but they often bring rather unsolvable problems than really improving himan life quality. One of the reasons is that the general level of earth science is clearly insufficient to adequately solve and even consider many urgent himan problems. To provide creating and developing applicable and, moreover, adequate methods, theories, and sciences, we need their testing via universal if possible, at least applicable and, moreover, adequate test metamethods, metatheories, and metasciences whose general level has to be high enough. Mathematics as universal quantitative scientific language naturally has to play here a key role.
But classical mathematics [1] with hardened systems of axioms, intentional search for contradictions and even their purposeful creation cannot (and does not want to) regard very many problems in science, engineering, and life. This generally holds when solving valuation, estimation, discrimination, control, and optimization problems as well as in particular by measuring very inhomogeneous objects and rapidly changeable processes. It is discovered [2] that classical fundamental mathematical theories, methods, and concepts [1] are insufficient for adequately solving and even considering many typical urgent problems.
Mega-overmathematics [2] based on its uninumbers, quantielements, quantisets, and uniquantities with quantioperations and quantirelations provides universally and adequately modeling, expressing, measuring, evaluating, and estimating general objects. This all creates the basis for many further developing, extending, and applying mega-overmathematics fundamental sciences systems. Among them are, in particular, science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences systems [3] which are universal.
Fundamental Science Unimathematical Test Fundamental Metasciences System
Fundamental science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system in mega-overmathematics [2] is one of such systems and can efficiently, universally and adequately strategically unimathematically test any fundamental science. This system includes:
fundamental metascience of fundamental science test philosophy, strategy, and tactic including fundamental science test philosophy metatheory, fundamental science test strategy metatheory, and fundamental science test tactic metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science consideration including science fundamentals determination metatheory, fundamental science approaches determination metatheory, fundamental science methods determination metatheory, and fundamental science conclusions determination metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science analysis including fundamental subscience analysis metatheory, fundamental science analysis metatheory, fundamental science approaches analysis metatheory, fundamental science methods analysis metatheory, and fundamental science conclusions analysis metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science synthesis including science fundamentals synthesis metatheory, fundamental science approaches synthesis metatheory, fundamental science methods synthesis metatheory, and fundamental science conclusions synthesis metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science objects, operations, relations, and criteria including fundamental science object metatheory, fundamental science operation metatheory, fundamental science relation metatheory, and fundamental science criterion metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science evaluation, measurement, and estimation including fundamental science evaluation metatheory, fundamental science measurement metatheory, and fundamental science estimation metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science expression, modeling, and processing including fundamental science expression metatheory, fundamental science modeling metatheory, and fundamental science processing metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science symmetry and invariance including fundamental science symmetry metatheory and fundamental science invariance metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science bounds and levels including fundamental science bound metatheory and fundamental science level metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science directed test systems including fundamental science test direction metatheory and fundamental science test step metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science tolerably simplest limiting, critical, and worst cases analysis and synthesis including fundamental science tolerably simplest limiting cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, fundamental science tolerably simplest critical cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, fundamental science tolerably simplest worst cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, and fundamental science tolerably simplest limiting, critical, and worst cases counterexamples building metatheories;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science defects, mistakes, errors, reserves, reliability, and risk including fundamental science defect metatheory, fundamental science mistake metatheory, fundamental science error metatheory, fundamental science reserve metatheory, fundamental science reliability metatheory, and fundamental science risk metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science test result evaluation, measurement, estimation, and conclusion including fundamental science test result evaluation metatheory, fundamental science test result measurement metatheory, fundamental science test result estimation metatheory, and fundamental science test result conclusion metatheory;
fundamental metascience of fundamental science supplement, improvement, modernization, variation, modification, correction, transformation, generalization, and replacement including fundamental science supplement metatheory, fundamental science improvement metatheory, fundamental science modernization metatheory, fundamental science variation metatheory, fundamental science modification metatheory, fundamental science correction metatheory, fundamental science transformation metatheory, fundamental science generalization metatheory, and fundamental science replacement metatheory.
Fundamental science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system in megamathematics [2] is universal and very efficient.
References
[1] Encyclopaedia of Mathematics / Managing editor M. Hazewinkel. Volumes 1 to 10. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 1988-1994
[2] Lev Gelimson. Elastic Mathematics. General Strength Theory. The "Collegium" All World Academy of Sciences Publishers, Munich (Germany), 2004, 496 pp.
[3] Lev Gelimson. Science Unimathematical Test Fundamental Metasciences Systems. Mathematical Journal of the “Collegium” All World Academy of Sciences, Munich (Germany), 12 (2012), 1