Material Strength Science Unimathematical Test Fundamental Metasciences System

by

© Ph. D. & Dr. Sc. Lev Gelimson

Academic Institute for Creating Fundamental Sciences (Munich, Germany)

Physical Journal

of the "Collegium" All World Academy of Sciences

Munich (Germany)

12 (2012), 1

Keywords: Material strength science, megascience, revolution, megastrength, megamathematics, overmathematics, unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system, knowledge, philosophy, strategy, tactic, analysis, synthesis, object, operation, relation, criterion, conclusion, evaluation, measurement, estimation, expression, modeling, processing, symmetry, invariance, bound, level, worst case, defect, mistake, error, reserve, reliability, risk, supplement, improvement, modernization, variation, modification, correction, transformation, generalization, replacement.

There are many separate scientific achievements of mankind but they often bring rather unsolvable problems than really improving himan life quality. One of the reasons is that the general level of earth science is clearly insufficient to adequately solve and even consider many urgent himan problems. To provide creating and developing applicable and, moreover, adequate methods, theories, and sciences, we need their testing via universal if possible, at least applicable and, moreover, adequate test metamethods, metatheories, and metasciences whose general level has to be high enough. Mathematics as universal quantitative scientific language naturally has to play here a key role.

But classical mathematics [1] with hardened systems of axioms, intentional search for contradictions and even their purposeful creation cannot (and does not want to) regard very many problems in science, engineering, and life. This generally holds when solving valuation, estimation, discrimination, control, and optimization problems as well as in particular by measuring very inhomogeneous objects and rapidly changeable processes. It is discovered [2] that classical fundamental mathematical theories, methods, and concepts [1] are insufficient for adequately solving and even considering many typical urgent problems.

Megamathematics including overmathematics [2] based on its uninumbers, quantielements, quantisets, and uniquantities with quantioperations and quantirelations provides universally and adequately modeling, expressing, measuring, evaluating, and estimating general objects. This all creates the basis for many further megamathematics fundamental sciences systems developing, extending, and applying overmathematics. Among them are, in particular, science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences systems [3] which are universal.

Material strength science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system in megastrength [2] is one of such systems and can efficiently, universally and adequately strategically unimathematically test any material strength science. This system includes:

fundamental metascience of material strength science test philosophy, strategy, and tactic including material strength science test philosophy metatheory, material strength science test strategy metatheory, and material strength science test tactic metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science consideration including material strength science fundamentals determination metatheory, material strength science approaches determination metatheory, material strength science methods determination metatheory, and material strength science conclusions determination metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science analysis including material strength subscience analysis metatheory, material strength science fundamentals analysis metatheory, material strength science approaches analysis metatheory, material strength science methods analysis metatheory, and material strength science conclusions analysis metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science synthesis including material strength science fundamentals synthesis metatheory, material strength science approaches synthesis metatheory, material strength science methods synthesis metatheory, and material strength science conclusions synthesis metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science objects, operations, relations, and criteria including material strength science object metatheory, material strength science operation metatheory, material strength science relation metatheory, and material strength science criterion metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science evaluation, measurement, and estimation including material strength science evaluation metatheory, material strength science measurement metatheory, and material strength science estimation metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science expression, modeling, and processing including material strength science expression metatheory, material strength science modeling metatheory, and material strength science processing metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science symmetry and invariance including material strength science symmetry metatheory and material strength science invariance metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science bounds and levels including material strength science bound metatheory and material strength science level metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science directed test systems including material strength science test direction metatheory and material strength science test step metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science tolerably simplest limiting, critical, and worst cases analysis and synthesis including material strength science tolerably simplest limiting cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, material strength science tolerably simplest critical cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, material strength science tolerably simplest worst cases analysis and synthesis metatheories, and material strength science tolerably simplest limiting, critical, and worst cases counterexamples building metatheories;

fundamental metascience of material strength science defects, mistakes, errors, reserves, reliability, and risk including material strength science defect metatheory, material strength science mistake metatheory, material strength science error metatheory, material strength science reserve metatheory, material strength science reliability metatheory, and material strength science risk metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science test result evaluation, measurement, estimation, and conclusion including material strength science test result evaluation metatheory, material strength science test result measurement metatheory, material strength science test result estimation metatheory, and material strength science test result conclusion metatheory;

fundamental metascience of material strength science supplement, improvement, modernization, variation, modification, correction, transformation, generalization, and replacement including material strength science supplement metatheory, material strength science improvement metatheory, material strength science modernization metatheory, material strength science variation metatheory, material strength science modification metatheory, material strength science correction metatheory, material strength science transformation metatheory, material strength science generalization metatheory, and material strength science replacement metatheory.

The material strength science unimathematical test fundamental metasciences system in megamathematics [2] is universal and very efficient.

References

[1] Encyclopaedia of Mathematics / Managing editor M. Hazewinkel. Volumes 1 to 10. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 1988-1994.

[2] Lev Gelimson. Elastic Mathematics. General Strength Theory. The "Collegium" All World Academy of Sciences Publishers, Munich (Germany), 2004, 496 pp.

[3] Lev Gelimson. Science Unimathematical Test Fundamental Metasciences Systems. Mathematical Journal of the “Collegium” All World Academy of Sciences, Munich (Germany), 12 (2012), 1.