Strength Information Fundamental Sciences System (Essential)
by
© Ph. D. & Dr. Sc. Lev Gelimson
Academic Institute for Creating Fundamental Sciences (Munich, Germany)
Strength and Engineering Journal
of the "Collegium" All World Academy of Sciences
Munich (Germany)
10 (2010), 3
Strength information fundamental sciences system includes fundamental sciences of its analysis, synthesis, and unification; modeling (including two-dimensional representation of three-dimensional data possibly together with universal limiting criteria whose surfaces can be or not to be symmetric with respect to the principal diagonal of the space of the principal stresses); processing; approximation; and estimation.
Use the principal stresses σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3 (regulated by this ordering) [1, 2] at a material's point along with limiting stress values σL such as yield stress σy or ultimate strength σL , namely σLt in tension and σLc in compression with σLc ≥ 0 and α = σLt/σLc if σLt ≠ σLc [1, 2]. In technical mechanics, tensile stresses are considered positive and compressive stresses negative. In geomechanics, on the contrary, tensile stresses are considered negative and compressive stresses positive. To provide stress sign unification necessary and very useful in mechanics at all including both technical mechanics and geomechanics, introduce pressures
p = - σ , p1 = - σ3 , p2 = - σ2 , p3 = - σ1 , p1 ≥ p2 ≥ p3 ,
use them in geomechanics instead of stresses, consider tensile stresses positive and compressive stresses negative as in technical mechanics, and regard tensile pressures negative and compressive pressures positive as in geomechanics, which is natural.
Apply fundamental science of data modeling [3, 4]. Consider the space of the principal stresses with coordinate system Oσ1σ2σ3 [1]. First, rotate this coordinate system about axis Oσ3 by the Euler precession angle [1, 5] ψ = π/4 = 45° with cos φ = sin φ = 2-1/2 and obtain coordinate system Oσ1'σ2'σ3 such that transformed axis Oσ1' becomes the bisectrix (bisector) between the previous axes Oσ1 and Oσ2 . Secondly, rotate this coordinate system Oσ1'σ2'σ3 in plane Oσ1'σ3 by the Euler nutation angle [1, 5] φ = arccos 3-1/2 with cos φ = 3-1/2 and sin φ = 3-1/2 and obtain coordinate system Oσ1''σ2'σ3' such that transformed axis Oσ3' becomes the spatial diagonal σ1 = σ2 = σ3 of the first octant of the initial coordinate system Oσ1σ2σ3 . Use no intrinsic rotation, i.e., the Euler intrinsic rotation angle [1, 5] θ = 0 with cos φ = 1 and sin φ = 0. Finally, rename the axes, namely, Oσ1'' to Oσx , Oσ2' to Oσy , and Oσ23' to Oσz so that namely z-axis provides σ1 = σ2 = σ3 . The transformation formulae for using this coordinate system Oσxσyσz instead of the initial coordinate system Oσ1σ2σ3 are
σ1 = 6-1/2σx - 2-1/2σy + 3-1/2σz , σ2 = 6-1/2σx + 2-1/2σy + 3-1/2σz , σ3 = - (2/3)-1/2σx + 3-1/2σz ;
σx = 6-1/2σ1 + 6-1/2σ2 - (2/3)-1/2σ3 , σy = - 2-1/2σ1 + 2-1/2σ2 , σz = 3-1/2σ1 + 3-1/2σ2 + 3-1/2σ3 .
In any half-plane starting at the diagonal axis Oσz and containing it and for any strength data point (σx , σy , σz) situated in this half-plane, introduce axis Oσm identified with axis Oσz , take axis Oσd in this plane with
σd = pd = (σx2 + σy2)1/2
and place the corresponding diagram point (σm , σd = pd). Here (nota bene) σd = pd for using the first and second quadrants only (and NOT σd = - pd) to provide nonnegative values only both for σd and for pd , and introduce 2D diagram σmOσd of 3D both nonlimiting and limiting stresses and pressures, see the next figure
in which subscripts are not shown so that
σd = σd , σdL = σdL , pd = pd , pdL = pdL ,
σm = σm = (σ1 + σ2 + σ3)/3, -pm = -pm = -(p1 + p2 + p3)/3, σmL = σmL , σttt = σttt .
The curve in this figure shows the intersection of the limiting surface of a certain limiting strength criterion with this half-plane starting at the diagonal axis Oσz and containing it.
If this limiting surface has a rotational symmetry about axis Oσz , then the choice of this half-plane has no influence on the results and, in particular, on this diagram.
By no rotational symmetry of this limiting surface, select any certain half-plane starting at the diagonal axis Oσz , containing it, and building any definite angle η (0 ≤ η < 2π) in the anticlockwise direction with axis Oσx , and denote this half-plane as the η-half-plane for which we shall create a unified end diagram by the following algorithm:
1. For any certain η'-half-plane starting at the diagonal axis Oσz , containing it, and building any definite angle η' (0 ≤ η' < 2π) in the anticlockwise direction with axis Oσx , create the corresponding η'-diagram in this η'-half-plane. In this η'-diagram, the curve shows the intersection of the limiting surface of the limiting strength criterion under consideration with this η'-half-plane. For any (either limiting or nonlimiting) η'-half-plane strength data point [σx(η'), σy(η'), σz(η') = σm(η')] initially situated in this η'-plane and own for it, consequently define and determine
σd(η') = pd(η') = {[σx(η')]2 + [σy(η')]2}1/2 ,
limiting value σdL(η') of σd(η') either by the constant direction to (or from) the origin O if σm(η') ≥ 0 or by constant value σm(η') if σm(η') ≤ 0, the both definition and determination approaches coinciding if σm(η') = 0,
reserve
n(η') = σdL(η')/σd(η')
of this η'-diagram point [σm(η'), σd(η') = pd(η')] also placed in this η'-diagram.
2. In particular, for the η-half-plane for which we shall create the unified end η-diagram, the curve in this η-diagram shows the intersection of the limiting surface of the limiting strength criterion under consideration with this η-half-plane. For any (either limiting or nonlimiting) η-half-plane strength data point [σx(η), σy(η), σz(η) = σm(η)] initially situated in this η-half-plane and own for it, consequently define and determine
σd(η) = pd(η) = {[σx(η)]2 + [σy(η)]2}1/2 ,
limiting value σdL(η) of σd(η) either by the constant direction to (or from) the origin O if σm(η) ≥ 0 or by constant value σm(η) if σm(η) ≤ 0, the both definition and determination approaches coinciding if σm(η) = 0,
reserve
n(η) = σdL(η)/σd(η)
of this η-diagram point [σm(η), σd(η) = pd(η)] also placed in this η-diagram.
3. For any (either limiting or nonlimiting) η'-half-plane (η’ ≠ η) strength data point [σx(η'), σy(η'), σz(η') = σm(η')] (initially NOT situated in this η-half-plane and NOT own for it) in which this point is initially situated and own for which, consider namely the corresponding η'-half-plane in which this point is initially situated and own for which, as well as for the corresponding η'-diagram point [σm(η'), σd(η') = pd(η')], define and determine a corresponding additional (either limiting or nonlimiting) η-half-plane strength data point [σx(η), σy(η), σz(η) = σm(η)] in this η-half-plane initially NOT situated in this η-half-plane and NOT own for it, as well as for the corresponding additional η-diagram point [σm(η), σd(η) = pd(η)] initially NOT situated in this η-diagram and NOT own for it. Namely, take σz(η) = σm(η) = σz(η') = σm(η') and n(η) = n(η'). To provide the last equality, first in this η'-diagram in this η'-half-plane, consequently take σd(η'), the corresponding values σdL(η'), and then n(η'). Secondly, consider this η-diagram in this η-half-plane, take n(η) = n(η'), σz(η) = σm(η) = σz(η') = σm(η'), then (by value σz(η) = σm(η) in this η-diagram) determine σdL(η), further
σd(η) = pd(η) = σdL(η)/n(η),
place desired additional η-diagram point [σm(η), σd(η) = pd(η)] and desired additional η-half-plane strength data point [σd(η) cos η , σd(η) sin η , σz(η) = σm(η)].
Placing all the spatial strength data points in one half-plane and in one two-dimensional diagram brings very many advantages by strength data analysis, comparing, processing, approximation, and estimation.
References
[1] Filonenko-Borodich M. M. Mechanical Strength Theories. – Moscow State University Publishers, Moscow, 1961. – 92 pp. – In Russian.
[2] Lev Gelimson. Providing helicopter fatigue strength: Unit loads. In: Structural Integrity of Advanced Aircraft and Life Extension for Current Fleets – Lessons Learned in 50 Years After the Comet Accidents, Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF Symposium, Dalle Donne, C. (Ed.), 2005, Hamburg, Vol. II, pp. 589 – 600.
[3] Lev Gelimson. Providing Helicopter Fatigue Strength: Flight Conditions. In: Structural Integrity of Advanced Aircraft and Life Extension for Current Fleets – Lessons Learned in 50 Years After the Comet Accidents, Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF Symposium, Dalle Donne, C. (Ed.), 2005, Hamburg, Vol. II, 405-416
[4] Lev Gelimson. Fundamental Science of Data Modeling. The ”Collegium” All World Academy of Sciences Publishers, Munich, 2010
[5] Encyclopaedia of Mathematics. Ed. M. Hazewinkel. Volumes 1 to 10. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 1988-1994